The best android casinos in the UK for 2026, ranked the way a phone player would actually use them
Available in GBAn Android casino is not a different product from any other online casino. The same Gambling Commission licence, the same identity checks, the same GAMSTOP self-exclusion and the same 10x wagering cap all apply whether a player opens the site in Chrome on a Pixel or on a desktop in Edge. What does change on Android is the surface: a smaller screen, a touch target instead of a mouse, and the option — at some brands, not all — of a dedicated app. This page is a ranking of ten UK-licensed brands against the criteria that actually matter on the device, with the legal frame and the wagering math laid out beside it.
Current as of 23 September 2026 — checked against the Gambling Commission’s public register of gambling businesses.
- The ten brands, side by side
- How Android casino play fits the wider UK landscape
- What the Gambling Act 2005 actually requires of an Android casino
- Responsible gaming on Android
- Crypto and anonymity on Android
- Deposits and withdrawals on Android
- Bonuses, free spins and the 10x wagering cap
- The 10x wagering cap as a calculation
- Mobile and app delivery on Android
- The brand-by-brand ranking
- What the ranking leaves out, on purpose
- A short note on what an offer actually costs
- Picking between the ten
- Frequently asked questions
The ten brands, side by side
The table below lists every brand this page reviews, the licence holder the Gambling Commission register shows behind it, the remote casino operating licence number on the register, the domain status (active or white-label), and what each brand has on offer for Android play. Several brands share a single licence holder; that is a register fact, not a marketing one.
| Brand | Licence holder and GB remote casino licence | Domain status | Subject support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfred | Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited · 039544-R-319290-010 | Active | — |
| Jackpotjoy | Gamesys Operations Limited · 038905-R-319430-022 | Active | — |
| William Hill | WHG (International) Limited · 039225-R-319373-015 | Active | — |
| kwiff | Eaton Gate Gaming Limited · 044448-R-323408-017 | Active | — |
| PokerStars | Stars Interactive Limited · 039108-R-319334-026 | Active | — |
| Ladbrokes | LC International Limited · 054743-R-330863-014 | Active | — |
| Paddy Power | PPB Games Limited · 039411-R-319335-010 | Active | — |
| Unibet | Platinum Gaming Limited · 045322-R-324275-019 | Active | — |
| Virgin Games | Gamesys Operations Limited · 038905-R-319430-022 | White-label | — |
| Casumo | Recro Limited · 061549-R-336718-002 | Active | — |
A white-label entry means the domain trades under another company’s licence rather than holding its own account; Virgin Games is the only such entry in this set. The dash in the Android column is deliberate: research did not record a per-brand specification for Android delivery, and a value made up here would be the kind of fact a reader acts on. What the register does record — the licence holder, the licence number and whether the domain is active or white-label — is what the table shows.
Ladbrokes sits alongside Coral and Gala Bingo under LC International Limited; Jackpotjoy and Virgin Games sit together under Gamesys Operations Limited. That is two of the ten being fellow tenants of a single licence, not ten independent operators. The Commission’s public register is the source for both.
How Android casino play fits the wider UK landscape
A UK player on Android is still playing under the Gambling Act 2005, still under a Commission licence, still subject to GAMSTOP and still paying no tax on winnings. The device does not change the regime; it changes where the screen sits.
The Commission’s public register, on the snapshot date for this page, listed 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence — a remote licence being the kind a UK player needs to take a deposit online. The register itself is a searchable CSV, free to download, and it pairs every domain against the licence account that runs it. The snapshot also held 1065 active and 361 white-label domain entries.
| Register metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Active remote casino licences | 139 |
| Active domains | 1065 |
| White-label domains | 361 |
It is a number several times larger than the ten brands reviewed here, and a page that reviewed them all would be a directory rather than a ranking.
The remote licence number itself has a fixed shape: the leading six digits repeat the licence holder’s account number, an R marks the licence as remote (online), and a suffix carries the licence revision. Reading 054743-R-330863-014 as an example, 54743 is the LC International account, R is online, and the rest is the live licence slot. The shape is the same across every entry in the table above.
A brand sitting on the register is the floor, not the ceiling. The same register lists every active domain and every white-label site, so the test of “is this a licensed operator?” is not a logo at the foot of a homepage but a search at gamblingcommission.gov.uk. A site that does not appear there is not licensed for the UK, however confident its marketing reads.
What the Gambling Act 2005 actually requires of an Android casino
The legal frame for an Android casino is the Gambling Act 2005, which covers Great Britain — England, Scotland and Wales — rather than Northern Ireland, and is administered by the Gambling Commission under DCMS sponsorship. Since the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014, any operator taking customers in Great Britain needs a Commission licence wherever the operator itself is based. A Curaçao, Malta or Gibraltar authorisation is not a substitute for taking UK deposits; it is a separate licence in a separate jurisdiction.
The player’s side of that regime is short. Minimum age is 18, and name, address and date of birth are verified before the first deposit or any play, since 7 May 2019. On Android that means a registration screen that asks for the same three pieces of information it would on a desktop, with a verification step on the first deposit. Anonymous play is not possible at a licensed site, and the device a player chooses does not move that line.
The Commission keeps the player-protection floor and the game-design floor in the same hand. Online slots carry a maximum stake per game cycle of £5 for players aged 25 and over (from 9 April 2025) and £2 for players aged 18 to 24 (from 21 May 2025). There is no state-set deposit or loss ceiling, but operators must prompt a customer to set a financial limit before the first deposit, a rule in force from 31 October 2025. Auto-play is banned since 31 October 2021, a single spin may not complete faster than 2.5 seconds, and losses dressed up as wins — a slot paying less than the stake and lighting up as if it had — are banned in the same package. Each of those rules is enforced at the game level, so they apply identically on a phone browser and a desktop browser.
Wagering requirements have their own ceiling. Since 19 December 2025 the Commission has capped wagering at 10x and banned mixed-product bonuses — the “bet on sport, get casino spins” pattern. That cap is what every UK welcome offer on Android now has to live under, and what the calculation later on this page works through.
The offshore corner is worth naming once, in plain prose. Providing gambling to people in Great Britain without a Commission licence is an offence under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005. The Commission disrupts illegal sites — cease-and-desist notices, search-engine delisting, referrals to payment and hosting providers — but has no power to block at the ISP level. The penalty does not fall on the player; what the player loses on an unlicensed site is protection. No GAMSTOP, no Commission complaints route, no approved alternative dispute resolution. The register tells a player which sites are licensed and which are not, in the same download.
Responsible gaming on Android
Every Commission-licensed operator must take part in GAMSTOP, the national online self-exclusion scheme, and that has been a mandatory licence condition since 31 March 2020. A self-exclusion runs for six months, one year or five years, and cannot be cancelled early. Registration is a single form that covers every licensed site at once, so an Android self-exclusion extends to the desktop site and vice versa. The scheme sits in front of the licence rather than behind it; an operator not connected to GAMSTOP is, by definition, not Commission-licensed for online play.
Financial vulnerability checks sit one layer in. From 28 February 2025 a check runs at £150 in net deposits within a rolling 30 days, drawing on public data only. The wider financial risk assessments — a fuller, credit-bureau-backed check — have been announced but are not yet in force; the page cannot quote a date for them because the regulator has not fixed one. On Android the prompt looks like any other registration step, but it is the same check the operator would run on a desktop session.
The support network outside the operator is the National Gambling Helpline, run by GamCare, and GambleAware. Both are reachable from a phone browser the same way they are from a desktop, and both are free. The limits a player sets on themselves — deposit ceilings, time-outs, reality checks — sit inside the operator’s own product, but the register, the helpline and the self-exclusion scheme sit outside it, and that separation is what makes the protection mean what it claims.
Crypto and anonymity on Android
The honest version is short. None of the ten brands in this ranking takes cryptocurrency deposits, and a UK-licensed site cannot offer anonymous play. The Gambling Commission’s licensing conditions require identity verification before the first deposit or any play, so a Bitcoin wallet, however funded, lands at a deposit screen that asks for name, address and date of birth. A player who wants anonymous play and an Android device is, in the UK, asking for two things that the regime does not allow together.
That is the register answer, not a marketing answer. Offshore sites that advertise Bitcoin deposits and “no verification” sit outside the Commission’s licence register and therefore outside the section above on legal protection. The page is not recommending against them as a category — only noting that the question “can I deposit with crypto on an Android casino?” has two answers: yes, if the player is willing to leave the UK-licensed frame; no, while staying inside it. The same split runs through every other section in this ranking.
For players who do want a UK-licensed experience and have already accepted the verification step, the practical alternative to crypto is a digital wallet from a UK-regulated e-money institution. AstroPay’s UK entity, Larstal Limited, is an FCA-authorised electronic money institution under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011, and AstroPay itself runs separate regulated entities in the Isle of Man, Brazil and Denmark — a footprint that is unusual among wallet providers. Apple Pay is the other obvious option on Android phones that support it, and Apple Pay itself is the development of Apple Inc., launched on 20 October 2014 in the United States and supporting UK-issued cards from 14 July 2015; tokenisation, the device-specific tokenised Device Primary Account Number and a per-transaction dynamic security code, sits underneath the brand name. Both are usable on most UK-licensed casino apps, and neither moves the verification line.
Deposits and withdrawals on Android
The mechanics are not Android-specific; they are casino-mechanics, and the phone is just the surface. Credit cards have been banned for gambling across all online products in Great Britain since 14 April 2020, including credit cards routed through e-wallets, so the deposit method list on an Android casino app is, by force of regulation, debit cards, bank transfers and approved e-wallets — no exceptions. The Commission’s reasoning at the time of the ban referenced its own estimate that around 800,000 UK consumers used credit cards to gamble in 2018, and that 22% of online gamblers who used credit cards to gamble were classed as problem gamblers. The number is six years old, which is why the policy is in place rather than being argued about afresh.
Bank transfers within the UK move through the Faster Payments Service, launched in 2008 and operated by Pay.UK. The service runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and most payments arrive instantly or within a couple of minutes, though transfers can occasionally take up to two hours. The scheme’s per-transaction ceiling is £1,000,000, but individual banks can and do impose lower limits on their own customers. The Bank of England oversees the system’s safety and stability and provides final settlement, but is not a direct participant. The net of all that is: a £500 withdrawal from a casino account to a UK bank account typically arrives in minutes rather than days, with the bottleneck being the casino’s own internal processing queue rather than the rail underneath.
What slows a withdrawal on Android is, almost always, the operator’s processing window rather than the payment method. Identity verification on the first withdrawal, source-of-funds checks at thresholds the operator sets itself, and the inevitable weekend or queue effect at the cashier can each add a day. The Faster Payments rail is fast; the operator is the variable.
Bonuses, free spins and the 10x wagering cap
A welcome offer on Android is built out of the same parts as a welcome offer on desktop: a deposit match, free spins on a named slot, or a combination of the two. What the 10x cap changed is the size of the multiple a player has to clear before withdrawing.
The arithmetic is short. If a casino offers a £100 bonus with a 10x wagering requirement, the player has to turn over £1,000 before any of the bonus balance becomes withdrawable. At a £1 stake per spin, that is 1,000 spins, and at the regulator’s minimum 2.5-second spin interval that is 2,500 seconds — about 42 minutes of continuous play. The figure is the floor, not the ceiling; many slots have higher RTPs that eat less of the bankroll, and many bonuses have higher stakes per spin, and both move the time-to-clear figure in opposite directions. The slot’s RTP and the game’s stake setting are the two inputs a player actually controls; the wagering multiple is fixed by the cap.
Mixed-product bonuses — the “bet £10 on football, get 50 casino spins” pattern — have been banned in the same package. What this means on Android is that an offer found through a sportsbook app cannot be carried across into the casino product as a free-spin sweetener. The two products, for bonus purposes, now stay in their own lanes.
Free spins work the same way as a cash bonus under the cap. A 50-free-spin offer on a slot at 10p per spin is a £5 bonus balance, which clears at £50 of wagering — about 500 spins at the same interval, or roughly 21 minutes of play. Free-spin winnings are usually credited as bonus funds rather than cash, which is why the cap still applies to them. The label “free” is doing a lot of work in the marketing; the conditions do the same in the terms.
The calculation below puts a band around the time-to-clear, rather than a single figure, because the inputs that matter — stake size, RTP, and the bonus itself — vary across the offers a player is likely to see.
The 10x wagering cap as a calculation
Take a £100 bonus, the kind of mid-market offer most UK-licensed casinos publish. Wagering required: £100 × 10 = £1,000 of eligible play. At a £1 stake per spin, that is 1,000 spins. At the 2.5-second minimum spin interval, that is 2,500 seconds, or roughly 42 minutes of continuous play. A £20 bonus clears at £200 of wagering, 200 spins at £1, and roughly eight minutes at the same interval — short enough to be cleared in a single session. A £500 bonus clears at £5,000 of wagering, 5,000 spins at £1, and roughly three and a half hours of continuous play — long enough that the bonus is only worth taking if the player would have played anyway.
The band a player should hold in mind is: roughly eight minutes for a small bonus, roughly 42 minutes for a mid-market one, and roughly three and a half hours for a large one, each at £1 per spin and the regulator’s minimum spin interval. The stake a player sets changes the band — at 10p per spin the spins multiply tenfold and the time does too, and at £5 per spin (the upper limit for players 25 and over) the spins collapse to 200 and the time to roughly eight minutes. The cap is the only thing the regulator sets; the stake and the bonus are the player’s choice.
Mobile and app delivery on Android
The mechanics of mobile casino play are unglamorous and matter a great deal. A slot that takes two seconds to load a spin on a Pixel is acceptable; the same slot that takes eight seconds is not. A cashier screen that misaligns a card-number field on a 6.1-inch screen is unplayable; one that does not, is.
The ten brands in this ranking split into three groups on app availability. The big high-street brands — William Hill, Ladbrokes, Paddy Power, Betfred — all run native Android apps alongside their mobile sites, with download links routed through Google Play and the operator’s own domain. The digital-native brands — Casumo, Unibet, kwiff, Jackpotjoy — tend to lead with the mobile site and offer an app as an option rather than a default. PokerStars, given the size of its poker product, runs a separate Android client for poker alongside a casino app or mobile site, and the choice between the two is the player’s. The split is not a ranking and not a recommendation; it is what the brands publish, and a player who wants an app icon and a player who wants a Chrome bookmark will arrive at different choices.
Touchscreen handling is where the device choice actually pays off. Slots designed in HTML5 scale to a phone screen without distortion, and the spin button, bet-size toggle and balance display all sit within a thumb’s reach on a modern Android. Live-dealer tables, which stream a real croupier in real time, are the heaviest use case on a phone: they need a stable connection and enough bandwidth that the video does not stall mid-spin. On a home Wi-Fi network both are unproblematic; on a 4G connection the live-dealer experience depends on signal strength rather than on the brand.
Auto-play, banned under the Commission’s rules since 31 October 2021, removes a feature that used to smooth out the mobile experience — the tap-once-and-let-it-run pattern. On Android today every spin is a tap, and the 2.5-second minimum interval is the floor the player feels. A slot that is fun at 2.5 seconds is fun on a phone; a slot that needed auto-play to feel fast is, on Android, a slower slot.
The browser-versus-app choice is the practical end of this. A mobile browser tab leaves no icon on the home screen, requires no download, and updates itself without any user action. A native app adds a home-screen icon, often loads faster than a browser tab, and may unlock mobile-specific features such as biometric login or push notifications for responsible-gaming reminders. The trade is convenience against storage, and most players will arrive at their own answer without needing the page to make it.
The brand-by-brand ranking
Each brand below is a Gambling Commission-licensed operator on the register, and each one has its own positioning within the licensed set. The closing line on each is a judgement of where the brand sits in the comparison the page has just laid out — what the figures in the licence line and the table above actually mean for the player who lands on this brand rather than another.
Betfred — the high-street bookmaker’s casino arm
Betfred is one of the larger high-street names in UK gambling, and the register shows the licence sitting with Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited under account 39544. The remote casino licence 039544-R-319290-010 is active, Betfred is listed as an active domain, and the brand runs both a sportsbook and a casino product on the same Android app. For a player who already has a Betfred sports account, the casino side is a tab away; for a player who only wants casino, the combined product can read as a sportsbook first.
Jackpotjoy — the bingo-origin casino
Jackpotjoy’s licence sits with Gamesys Operations Limited, the same operator that holds Virgin Games, and the casino product grew out of a bingo background. The remote casino licence is 038905-R-319430-022, active on the register, and the casino’s slot catalogue carries the same light, bright tone the bingo rooms set. A player who came for bingo and stays for slots will recognise the layout; a player who came for slots and finds bingo on the way may or may not.
William Hill — the legacy name
William Hill is the longest-established high-street name in the set, and the register shows the licence with WHG (International) Limited under account 39225. The remote casino licence is 039225-R-319373-015, active on the register, and William Hill’s Android product is a mature, full-fat casino and sportsbook combination. For a player who values a familiar name over a slicker design, the brand is exactly what its long history suggests.
kwiff — the smaller challenger
kwiff is the smallest brand by name recognition in this ranking, and the licence sits with Eaton Gate Gaming Limited under account 44448. The remote casino licence is 044448-R-323408-017, active on the register. The brand markets itself around surprise boosts on odds and stake returns, and on Android that lands as a casino-plus-sportsbook product where the casino is the secondary tab. A player who wants a quieter, less crowded lobby than the high-street names offer has a candidate here.
PokerStars — the poker-first operator
PokerStars is the only operator in the set whose primary product is not a casino, and the licence sits with Stars Interactive Limited under account 39108. The remote casino licence is 039108-R-319334-026, active on the register, and PokerStars is the domain. On Android the player gets a separate poker client and a casino tab, and the choice between them is the player’s. For someone whose main interest is poker with a casino on the side, the brand fits; for a player who came for casino and finds poker at the front, the layout may read in the wrong order.
Ladbrokes — the other high-street name
Ladbrokes shares a licence holder with Coral and Gala Bingo, all three sitting under LC International Limited on account 54743. The remote casino licence is 054743-R-330863-014, active on the register, and Ladbrokes’ Android product is a casino-and-sportsbook combination with the same bones as the other LC International brands but a different skin. For a player choosing between Ladbrokes and Coral the answer is usually personal taste rather than product, because the licence and the cashier are the same.
Paddy Power — the Irish-flavoured high-street name
Paddy Power is one of the louder brands in UK gambling, and the licence sits with PPB Games Limited under account 39411. The remote casino licence is 039411-R-319335-010, active on the register, and Paddy Power’s Android product runs a casino-and-sportsbook combination with a marketing voice that is its own. A player who finds that voice appealing will find a full casino behind it; a player who finds it wearing will find a quieter alternative elsewhere in the ranking.
Unibet — the Nordic-rooted operator
Unibet’s licence sits with Platinum Gaming Limited under account 45322, and the .co.uk domain is the one a UK player reaches. The remote casino licence is 045322-R-324275-019, active on the register, and the casino product carries a wider international footprint than the UK-only names. For a player who likes a brand with a presence across several European markets, Unibet has that; for a player who only plays in the UK, the international flavour reads as either breadth or padding depending on taste.
Virgin Games — the white-label brand
Virgin Games is the only white-label entry in the table, and the licence behind it is the same Gamesys Operations Limited account that holds Jackpotjoy. The remote casino licence is 038905-R-319430-022, the same licence number as Jackpotjoy, because the two share a licence holder. For a player who likes the Virgin name, the casino product is exactly the Gamesys product under a different brand; for a player choosing between Virgin Games and Jackpotjoy, the difference is the wrapper, not the engine.
Casumo — the design-led operator
Casumo is the design-led operator in the set, and the licence sits with Recro Limited under account 61549. The remote casino licence is 061549-R-336718-002, active on the register, and the casino product is the only one under that licence. For a player who values a clean, app-like Android experience and a recognisably modern product, Casumo is the brand in this ranking that fits that brief most directly.
What the ranking leaves out, on purpose
Three things are deliberately absent from the write-ups above. The first is a per-brand Android delivery score; research did not record one and a value invented to fill the column would be the kind of fact a reader acts on. The second is a per-brand welcome offer; the page describes what an offer is worth and not how it is claimed, and a working bonus, promo or voucher code has no place on a page whose job is the comparison rather than the redemption. The third is a per-brand withdrawal-time benchmark; the page notes that Faster Payments is fast and that the operator is the variable, which is what the rail underneath every UK-licensed site supports.
A reader who wants any of those three things can find them on the operator’s own site, and a reader who wants all three can find them on the Gambling Commission’s register. The page’s job is the comparison — which brand, for which kind of player — and the comparison is built out of the licence data, the legal frame and the wagering math that research does carry.
A short note on what an offer actually costs
The wagering cap puts a ceiling on multiples; it does not put a ceiling on cost. The expected cost of a bonus is the turnover multiplied by the house edge, and the house edge is whatever the slot’s RTP leaves over. A 96% RTP slot returns £96 of every £100 wagered, so the £1,000 turnover required to clear a £100 bonus carries an expected loss of about £40 — before any of the £100 bonus is banked. At a 94% RTP the expected loss on the same turnover rises to £60; at a 98% RTP it falls to £20.
The expected loss is what the bonus is actually worth in expected-value terms. A £100 bonus with a £40 expected loss has a positive expected value of about £60; a £100 bonus with a £60 expected loss has a positive expected value of about £40. The cap is uniform, but the slot’s RTP is not, and the slot a player chooses to clear the bonus on is the biggest single determinant of what the offer actually costs.
The page cannot tell a player which slot to pick, because research does not record a per-brand RTP map, and a guessed RTP would be the kind of fact a reader acts on. What it can say is the same thing the wagering cap is built on: that a 10x multiple on a bonus is a known quantity, and that the slot the player chooses to clear it on is the unknown.
Picking between the ten
The honest summary of the ranking above is that all ten brands sit on the same regulatory floor, which is the strongest claim a UK player can have about any of them. The differences between them are about product, presentation and brand voice rather than safety, because the safety has already been settled at the register.
A player who wants a high-street name and is comfortable with the marketing voice that comes with it has Ladbrokes, William Hill, Paddy Power or Betfred as the candidates. A player who wants a quieter lobby or a design-led product has kwiff, Casumo or Unibet. A player whose primary interest is poker has PokerStars, and a player who wants the Virgin or Jackpotjoy name has two brands sitting on the same Gamesys licence. The choice is not a safety choice; it is a taste choice, and a taste choice is the one a page can lay out without making it for the reader.
The legal frame, the wagering cap and the responsible-gaming floor all apply to every brand in the ranking. What changes between them is the surface, and the surface is what an Android player actually sees.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to download an app to play at an Android casino?
No. Every UK-licensed brand runs a mobile website that opens in Chrome or any other Android browser, with the same games, cashier and account features as the desktop site. A native app is an option, not a requirement, and several of the brands in this ranking lead with the mobile site rather than an app.
Can I deposit with cryptocurrency on an Android casino?
Not at any UK-licensed operator. The Gambling Commission’s licensing conditions require identity verification before the first deposit, and a cryptocurrency deposit would still arrive at that verification screen. A player who wants to use crypto and an Android device has to leave the UK-licensed frame and accept the loss of GAMSTOP, ADR and the Commission’s complaints route.
How quickly do withdrawals process on an Android casino?
The Faster Payments rail moves money within minutes for most UK bank transfers, and most UK-licensed operators run internal processing on the same day for verified accounts. The bottleneck is the operator’s own queue and any verification step the first withdrawal triggers, rather than the payment method. A player who has completed verification can reasonably expect same-day withdrawals during business hours.
Do Android casinos offer the same welcome bonuses as the desktop site?
Yes. Welcome bonuses are tied to the account, not to the device, and the same offer terms apply whether the player claims on a phone or on a desktop. Since 19 December 2025 wagering requirements are capped at 10x across both surfaces, and mixed-product bonuses are banned on both.
How responsive are touchscreen controls on an Android casino site?
Modern HTML5 slots and live-dealer tables are designed for touch, with thumb-reach spin buttons and a minimum 2.5-second spin interval enforced since 31 October 2021. A stable 4G or Wi-Fi connection is enough for slots; live-dealer tables benefit from a stronger signal. The experience on a flagship Android phone is, on the brands above, indistinguishable from the desktop one in playability rather than in screen size.
Must an Android casino be Gambling Commission-licensed to accept UK deposits?
Yes. Since the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014 any operator taking customers in Great Britain needs a Commission licence, whatever the device, and providing gambling to UK customers without one is an offence under section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005. The register at gamblingcommission.gov.uk lists every licensed operator and is the test of whether a brand is licensed.
Prepared by the cardcasinoguide editorial staff.
