What a First Deposit Bonus Really Costs a UK Player in 2026
A first deposit bonus is the line item most players read first and understand least. The number on the offer page — “100% up to £100”, “£50 in bonus funds”, “200 free spins” — describes what lands in the account on day one. The cost of turning that number into something withdrawable sits several paragraphs below it, in the small print, and most players reach the cashier before they ever read it. This page compares the ten UK-licensed brands that show up most often when players search for a first deposit bonus, walks through the licence conditions that govern every one of them, and works out what a representative offer takes to clear under the wagering cap that has applied since 19 December 2025.

Data current as of 7 November 2026, verified against the Gambling Commission’s public register of gambling businesses.
- Crypto Funding and a Licence That Still Demands ID
- How a UK-Licensed Casino Pays Out — and Why the Bonus Slows It Down
- The Ten UK-Licensed Brands Showing Up Most Often
- The Wider Landscape — What the Register Actually Says
- What a Gambling Commission Licence Actually Obliges an Operator to Do
- Safer-Gambling Conditions Around a First Deposit Bonus
- What the 10x Wagering Cap Costs in Real Terms
- The Brands Side by Side — How to Read the Comparison
- How the Bonus Terms Sit Inside the Cashier
- What the Register Looks Like on 18 September 2026
- What a UK Player Cannot Get, and Why
- Frequently Asked Questions
Crypto Funding and a Licence That Still Demands ID
Anyone searching for a “first deposit bonus” in the UK who would rather not hand over a bank statement has likely typed some version of “crypto” or “bitcoin” into the same search. That intuition runs into a wall at the first deposit screen, and the wall is the licence.

A Gambling Commission licensee must verify name, address and date of birth before the first deposit, cryptocurrency included. There is no anonymous route through a UK-licensed casino. The relevant condition sits in the Commission’s identity-verification rules, in force since 7 May 2019, and applies regardless of how the money arrives — debit card, bank transfer, e-wallet, or a crypto on-ramp converted at the cashier. A player who arrives with a Bitcoin balance still has to produce the same three pieces of information as a player who arrives with a building society current account, and the operator has to check them against documents before any play begins.
This is the part of the page that often surprises them. The instinct that crypto funding equals reduced friction is half right: settlement can be faster, the payment itself does not pass through a card network, and there is no credit-card gambling ban to worry about. But the licence does not soften because the rail does. Where a UK-licensed operator differs from an offshore brand is exactly here — the offshore brand may ask for less, may delay it, or may not ask at all, and that is the trade the player is making when they pick one. A licensed site asks first, plays second. An unlicensed site plays first and may never ask.
The other half of the trade is protection. A UK-licensed brand sits inside GAMSTOP, the Commission’s complaints route, and the approved alternative dispute resolution (ADR) providers. An offshore brand sits outside all three. The player does not lose money to a different rulebook on an unlicensed site — they lose the rulebook. A first deposit bonus funded in crypto at a licensed operator therefore looks like a first deposit bonus funded in any other way, except the funding rail. The bonus terms do not change with the rail.
The wider point, and the one that matters when comparing offers, is that any “crypto casino first deposit bonus UK” claim worth taking seriously is, by definition, a UK-licensed operator that accepts crypto at the cashier. The licence is what makes the rest of this page apply. Without it, no comparison on this site is meaningful — and the comparison below is built entirely on registered domains.
How a UK-Licensed Casino Pays Out — and Why the Bonus Slows It Down
The deposit side of the equation is fast. A UK bank transfer through the Faster Payments Service typically lands at the casino within minutes, often instantly. The Faster Payments scheme, run by Pay UK since 2008, operates around the clock and caps single transactions at £1,000,000 — though individual banks routinely set lower customer limits. A debit card deposit, an e-wallet such as PayPal or Skrill, or an Apple Pay push (Apple Pay began supporting UK-issued cards on 14 July 2015, with tokenised card data and a per-transaction dynamic security code) clears at the cashier in seconds. AstroPay’s UK arm, Larstal Limited, holds FCA authorisation as an electronic money institution, which is one of several routes a player can take to fund a UK-licensed account without a debit card on file.

The payout side is where a first deposit bonus changes the picture, because the operator is no longer just moving money. Three checks run before any withdrawal reaches a player at a UK-licensed site:
- Identity verification. Already done before the first deposit, so this should not delay a first withdrawal. It does delay withdrawals at operators who treat the bonus clearing as a fresh customer-relationship event.
- Source-of-funds and financial vulnerability checks. From 28 February 2025 the Commission requires a light-touch vulnerability check at £150 net deposits in any rolling 30-day window, run against public data only. The wider financial risk assessments that sit behind it are announced but not yet in force. A first deposit bonus that turns a small first deposit into a £500 play-through can hit the threshold inside a week.
- Bonus-specific wagering. Wagering requirements are capped at 10x since 19 December 2025. The cap applies to bonus funds, deposit + bonus combinations, free-spin winnings, and any “mixed-product” offer — something the page covers in detail below.
Once those three are satisfied, the operator can pay. The Commission’s published position is that withdrawals should be completed “without unreasonable delay”, which is a phrasing that works against the player in any dispute: the operator’s internal pending window — commonly 24 to 72 hours — sits inside “without unreasonable delay” on most readings, and the bank transfer on the other end clears through Faster Payments in minutes. The bottleneck is the operator’s queue, not the rail.
A player looking at a first deposit bonus with this in mind should ask three things before paying in:
- What is the wagering multiplier, and is it on the bonus alone or on deposit + bonus?
- What is the longest the operator gives the player to clear it?
- What is the maximum conversion — the cap on winnings from bonus funds that the player can withdraw?
A bonus with a 10x cap on the bonus alone, a 30-day window, and no conversion cap is rare and worth noticing. A bonus with a 10x cap on deposit + bonus, a 7-day window, and a £500 conversion cap is a different shape of offer — the headline number looks similar, the cost is not.
The Ten UK-Licensed Brands Showing Up Most Often
The brands below are the ten that recur across search results for a first-deposit-bonus casino in the UK. Each is listed on the Gambling Commission’s public register as an active domain of an account that holds a remote casino operating licence. The register held 139 such licensed businesses on 18 September 2026, against 1,065 active and 361 white-label domain entries on the same date — the gap between “139 licensed businesses” and “1,065 active domains” is the white-label structure, where several brands sit on a single licence (Ladbrokes, Coral and Gala Bingo, for instance, all run under LC International Limited). A licence number on the register takes the form ‘account-R-number-suffix’, with the leading six digits repeating the account number and the R marking the remote (online) licence.
The table below compares them on the four fields that research verifies. Bonus terms, payout speed, and game-weighting rules are not in the register and are not claimed here — research has not collected those for this set, and what the page does not have it does not assert.
| Brand | Licence holder and GB remote casino licence | Domain status on the register | Subject support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unibet | Platinum Gaming Limited — 045322-R-324275-019 | Active | — |
| Betfair | PPB Games Limited — 039411-R-319335-010 | Active | — |
| Sky Vegas | Bonne Terre Gaming Limited — 065519-R-339675-002 | Active | — |
| MrQ | Tek Fox Ltd — 060629-R-337532-004 | Active | — |
| Betway | Betway Limited — 039372-R-319367-029 | Active | — |
| PokerStars | Stars Interactive Limited — 039108-R-319334-026 | Active | — |
| Paddy Power | PPB Games Limited — 039411-R-319335-010 | Active | — |
| Ladbrokes | LC International Limited — 054743-R-330863-014 | Active | — |
| BetVictor | BV Gaming Limited — 039576-R-319370-028 | Active | — |
| Betfred | Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited — 039544-R-319290-010 | Active | — |
Two things stand out from the licence data without reading further. First, Betfair and Paddy Power share a licence — both sit under PPB Games Limited, account 39411, remote casino operating licence 039411-R-319335-010. A player who assumes these are run by different companies is mistaken; they are two brands on the same platform. Second, the licence holders themselves are a mixed bag of UK companies (Platinum Gaming, BV Gaming, LC International) and Gibraltar-registered ones (Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited). Under the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014, the location of the licence holder is irrelevant — what matters is the Commission licence. Petfre holds one. A player who treats “Gibraltar-registered” as a synonym for “offshore and unlicensed” is wrong on the facts.
What the register does not show, and what a first-deposit-bonus comparison needs, is the bonus offer itself. The Commission’s public register is a licence register, not a promotions register. The page therefore does the bonus comparison qualitatively below, with the maths worked through one offer at a time.
The Wider Landscape — What the Register Actually Says
The first deposit bonus sits inside a market of over a thousand active UK-facing websites, and the register is the place to anchor the picture.
| Register Metric | Count (18 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Businesses with active remote casino licences | 139 |
| Active domain entries | 1,065 |
| White-label entries | 361 |
The Gambling Commission’s public register, downloadable in full as CSV or Excel, listed 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence on 18 September 2026. Each business may operate several domains — the same register listed 1,065 active domain entries and 361 white-label entries on the same date. A white-label site is one that trades under another company’s licence: the technology, the games, and the back office belong to the licence holder, and the brand belongs to the white-label partner.
For a player, the practical meaning is that “1,426 website entries” is not “1,426 different casinos to compare”. Many of those entries are sportsbooks, bingo sites, or poker rooms sitting alongside a casino tab; many more are white-label skins of a handful of large platforms. A first-deposit-bonus comparison that treats every entry as a peer is comparing apples with apple-flavoured pears. The ten brands above are the ones that surface most often in UK-facing searches for casino first deposit bonuses, and the table compares them on what the register actually verifies — the licence, the holder, and the domain status.
The regulatory frame around that licence is set out below, in the section that owns it; the limits, the safer-gambling obligations, and the credit-card ban are all licence conditions, and they apply to every entry on the register equally.
What a Gambling Commission Licence Actually Obliges an Operator to Do
The licence frame that governs every first deposit bonus on this page sits in the Gambling Act 2005 and the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014. The 2005 Act covers Great Britain — England, Scotland and Wales; Northern Ireland runs its own regime and is not in scope. Since the 2014 Act, any operator taking customers in Great Britain needs a Commission licence wherever it is based. A Curaçao, Maltese or Gibraltar business licence is not a substitute; the test is the Commission register, full stop. Section 33 of the 2005 Act makes providing gambling to people in Great Britain without a licence an offence, and the Commission can disrupt illegal sites by cease-and-desist notices, payment and hosting referrals, and search-engine delisting — though it has no power to block at ISP level.
What holding a Commission licence costs the operator, and what it does for the player, breaks down into five obligations the player will meet in practice:
- Age and identity verification. Minimum age 18; name, address and date of birth verified before the first deposit, since 7 May 2019. Anonymous play is not possible.
- Stake limits on online slots. £5 per game cycle for players aged 25 and over from 9 April 2025; £2 per game cycle for 18-24s from 21 May 2025. A “game cycle” is one spin on a slot — the rule caps the unit bet, not the session.
- Speed limits and presentational rules. Auto-play is banned; a spin may not resolve faster than 2.5 seconds; losses disguised as wins (a slot showing a “win” animation for a payout smaller than the stake) are banned. All since 31 October 2021.
- Financial limits. No state-set deposit or loss ceiling, but operators must prompt a customer to set a financial limit before the first deposit, from 31 October 2025.
- Self-exclusion. GAMSTOP participation is mandatory for every online licence, since 31 March 2020. Self-exclusion runs six months, one year or five years, and cannot be cancelled early.
The Commission does not run a complaints hotline for players, but every licensed operator must belong to an approved ADR provider — an independent body that adjudicates disputes the operator’s own customer service has not resolved. A player who cannot escalate a complaint through the operator’s own process can take it to ADR; an unlicensed operator has no ADR route at all.
The bonus-specific rules sit on top of this frame. Credit cards have been banned for gambling since 14 April 2020 — including credit cards routed through e-wallets, which closes a route that was common in the late 2010s. The Commission’s stated reason, in the consultation that preceded the ban, was that around 800,000 UK consumers used credit cards to gamble in 2018, and 22% of online gamblers who used credit cards were classed as problem gamblers. Debit cards and bank transfers are unaffected. And since 19 December 2025, wagering requirements on any bonus are capped at 10x — bonus funds, deposit + bonus combinations, free-spin winnings, and any “mixed-product” offer (the kind that gives casino spins in return for a sports bet) are all in scope. The cap is the headline change of the past year and it is the number every offer on this page is measured against.
Safer-Gambling Conditions Around a First Deposit Bonus
A first deposit bonus is, by design, a hook for the first session. The licence conditions that sit around it are the part that limits what the hook can do.
The GAMSTOP self-exclusion register is the centre of the frame. Every UK-licensed online operator must take part, and a player who has signed up to GAMSTOP for any of the three periods — six months, one year, five years — cannot deposit, cannot claim a bonus, and cannot open an account at any licensed site for the duration. The period cannot be shortened. Several of the brands on the list above run a single sign-up flow that checks GAMSTOP on the first deposit screen; a player who has self-excluded and tries to register at a different brand on the same licence (Ladbrokes and Coral, for instance, both run under LC International Limited) will hit the same wall.
The financial vulnerability check, in force from 28 February 2025, runs at £150 net deposits inside any rolling 30-day window, against public data only. The check is light-touch — it does not pull a credit file or open banking data — but it triggers a prompt to the customer to confirm spending is affordable, and a flag may push the operator toward a more detailed conversation. A first deposit bonus that lands on day one and clears inside a week can put a player past £150 in net deposits without any other activity; the threshold is small.
The deposit-limit prompt that became mandatory on 31 October 2025 sits one screen earlier, before the first deposit. The operator has to ask the customer to set a financial limit — a daily, weekly or monthly ceiling — and may not proceed until the customer has either set one or actively declined. “Actively declined” is a Commission term: it means a click-through, not a passive skip, and the operator has to record which. The point is to put a boundary on the table before any money moves.
Outside the licence frame, the National Gambling Helpline (run by GamCare) and GambleAware are the two routes a player who feels the session is going wrong can use. GamCare runs the helpline; GambleAware funds treatment and research. Both are free. Neither requires the player to have raised the issue with the operator first.
A first deposit bonus at a licensed site is therefore not a free pass to “play and see what happens”. The site has already asked the player to set a limit, has already run a vulnerability check at £150 in 30 days, and has already checked GAMSTOP. The bonus terms are the player’s problem; the rest of the safety net is the operator’s, on pain of losing the licence.
What the 10x Wagering Cap Costs in Real Terms
The 19 December 2025 cap on wagering requirements — 10x, on bonus funds, deposit + bonus, free-spin winnings and mixed-product offers — is the single most important number on this page. It is also the number most players read as “the bonus is now simpler”, which is half right and half wrong.
The cap is on the multiplier. A £100 bonus at 10x means £1,000 of qualifying wagering. The same £100 bonus at 35x, which was the more common multiple in 2018–2023 offers, meant £3,500. The arithmetic of clearing the bonus is materially easier today than it was two years ago. What has not changed is the second half of the calculation: how much of that £1,000 comes back, on average, in the player’s pocket, and how long it takes to put through.
The wagering-turnover band calculation below takes one common shape of first-deposit-bonus offer and works it through. The inputs are: a £100 bonus, the 10x wagering cap in force since 19 December 2025, a representative slot RTP of 96% (a typical figure for a UK-licensed online slot), and a £1 stake per spin running at the regulatory minimum of 2.5 seconds per spin.
- Required turnover: £100 bonus × 10 = £1,000.
- Spins to clear: £1,000 ÷ £1 per spin = 1,000 spins.
- Time at the slot: 1,000 spins × 2.5 seconds = 2,500 seconds, or roughly 42 minutes of uninterrupted play. Real sessions are not uninterrupted, and breaks, navigation and game-switching extend this — a more realistic figure is two to three hours for a £100 bonus cleared at £1 spins.
- Expected return on £1,000 of wagering at 96% RTP: £960. The £40 difference is the house edge on the clearing volume, before any of the original £100 bonus is paid back.
The result, stated as a band with its condition rather than a single figure: clearing a £100 first-deposit bonus under the 10x cap, at a £1 spin on a 96% RTP slot, costs the player roughly £40 in expected house edge over about 1,000 spins, or around two to three hours of play at the regulatory spin interval. The band on “around” is the honest answer: real RTP varies by slot, real stake varies by player, and the cost varies with both. The £40 figure is the centre of the band, not its edge.
Two things follow from the calculation that the headline number obscures. First, the bonus is not free money. The £40 expected loss against a £100 bonus is a 40% effective cost on the bonus itself, even under the favourable reading of the cap. A player who treats the bonus as a way to play with the house’s money is mistaken — they are playing with their own money at the house’s edge, with the bonus as a temporary float. Second, the time cost is real. Two to three hours of focused slot play is a long session by any reading, and the bonus terms typically allow 7 or 30 days to clear it. A player who picks up a £100 bonus, plays 200 spins, and walks away has not cleared it; the bonus balance expires, and the £20 of house edge already paid is gone.
The band on offer size and stake size moves both numbers. A £200 bonus at 10x requires £2,000 of wagering, which is 2,000 spins at £1, or 500 spins at £4 (the upper limit for an over-25 player). The time cost at £4 is roughly 21 minutes — fast, but the expected loss at 96% RTP on £2,000 is £80, double the £40 figure for the £100 bonus. The arithmetic scales. The two levers a player has are the spin size and the slot’s RTP, and the only honest way to read a first-deposit-bonus offer is to work both before paying in.
The Brands Side by Side — How to Read the Comparison
A first-deposit-bonus comparison that stops at the licence table is incomplete, because the licence is the same for all ten brands. The differences sit below the licence — in the offer terms, the slot library, the withdrawal pending time, the bonus clearing window — and research has not collected those for this set. What the page does instead is set out the licence frame that applies to all of them, and the rules around bonus offers that apply to all of them, and let the reader work the rest out at the cashier.
What the comparison above does say, plainly:
- Betfair and Paddy Power share a licence. PPB Games Limited, account 39411, remote casino licence 039411-R-319335-010. Two brands on one platform. A player who has self-excluded at one and tries the other will be stopped by the same GAMSTOP check.
- Ladbrokes sits on LC International Limited, which also runs Coral and Gala Bingo. Same logic — same licence, same platform back end, same self-exclusion reach.
- Betfred’s licence holder is Gibraltar-registered (Petfre (Gibraltar) Limited). This does not make Betfred offshore. The 2014 Act brought every operator serving Great Britain into the Commission regime regardless of where the company is incorporated. The licence is the test.
- Sky Vegas, MrQ, PokerStars and BetVictor each run on their own licence. No shared back end with any other brand on this list.
The comparison also does not rank the brands. The page is built on the register, and the register does not rank — it lists. A player looking for a ranked top-10 of first-deposit-bonus offers needs bonus terms, payout speed, and game weighting for each brand, and research has not collected that data for this set. What the page does, instead, is the analysis a player can do alone: what a bonus costs in clearing, what the licence guarantees, and where the cost sits in the small print.
How the Bonus Terms Sit Inside the Cashier
A first-deposit-bonus offer at a UK-licensed site has, since 19 December 2025, a fixed outer frame:
- Wagering capped at 10x on bonus funds, deposit + bonus, free-spin winnings, and mixed-product offers.
- Credit cards banned for funding the deposit since 14 April 2020.
- Stake limited to £5 (25+) or £2 (18–24) per game cycle on online slots.
- Auto-play banned; spins at 2.5 seconds minimum; no “losses disguised as wins” presentation.
- 18+ identity verified before first deposit.
Inside that frame, the bonus itself is shaped by three operator-set terms:
- Match percentage and cap. “100% up to £100” means the operator matches the player’s first deposit, pound for pound, up to a £100 ceiling. A £50 deposit gets £50 in bonus funds; a £200 deposit gets £100, because of the cap.
- Wagering window. The operator sets a deadline — 7, 14, or 30 days is typical — in which the player must clear the wagering or the bonus expires.
- Game weighting. Slots usually count 100% toward wagering; table games and live casino often count 10–20%. A £10 blackjack hand at 10% weighting contributes £1 to the wagering total, which stretches the clearing time dramatically.
A player who reads the offer page and stops at the match percentage has read one line of three. The other two — the window and the weighting — are where the bonus’s real cost sits, and they are not standardised across brands.
The second-order terms, which the offer page sometimes buries:
- Maximum conversion cap. A few operators cap the amount that can be converted from bonus funds to withdrawable cash — “max bonus winnings: £500” is a common shape. Once the cap is hit, further play on bonus funds does not accrue withdrawable cash.
- Excluded games. Some slots, especially high-volatility titles, are excluded from bonus play. The exclusion list is in the terms, not the offer banner.
- Payment-method exclusions. A small number of operators exclude certain deposit methods (Skrill, Neteller, sometimes Apple Pay) from the bonus. The page has not collected those for this set; they are operator-by-operator.
What the player does with this list is read it before paying in. The 10x cap is the floor of what an offer can ask; the window, the weighting, and the conversion cap are where the cost lives. A £100 bonus with 30 days to clear at 100% slot weighting is one offer; the same £100 bonus with 7 days to clear at 50% weighting on the player’s preferred slots is another.
What the Register Looks Like on 18 September 2026
Three figures anchor the licence picture above. They are taken from the Commission’s own register on the date stated, and they are the only licence-side numbers on this page that change over time.
- 139 businesses holding an active remote casino operating licence.
- 1,065 active domain entries on the register.
- 361 white-label entries — domains that trade under another company’s licence.
The first number is the count of distinct licence holders. The second is the count of distinct websites. The third is the gap between them: 361 domains that are not independently licensed, but sit on someone else’s licence. A first-deposit-bonus offer at a white-label site is a first-deposit-bonus offer at the underlying licence holder, with a different brand on the front. The player who signs up to a white-label skin and has a complaint takes it to the licence holder, not the skin.
The register is searchable online and downloadable in full as CSV or Excel from the Commission’s website. A player who wants to verify a brand before paying in can do so in five minutes, against the same data the table above is built on.
What a UK Player Cannot Get, and Why
Three things a player searching for “anonymous” or “no-ID” casino bonuses might expect do not exist at a UK-licensed site:
- Anonymous play. Identity is verified before the first deposit, by document, since 7 May 2019.
- Crypto-funded no-ID play. The licence does not soften for the payment rail. Crypto on-ramps convert at the cashier, then the ID check runs.
- Credit-card funding. Banned since 14 April 2020, including via e-wallets.
A player who wants any of the three is, by definition, looking at an unlicensed site. The trade there is what the page opened with: an offshore brand may ask for less, may delay it, or may not ask at all. What the player gives up is the licence frame — no GAMSTOP, no ADR, no Commission complaints route, no obligation on the operator to pay out “without unreasonable delay”. The bonus offer may look more attractive on an unlicensed site; the comparison below does not apply to it, because the licence frame is what the comparison rests on.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is a first deposit bonus usually calculated?
A first-deposit bonus is typically a percentage of the player’s first deposit, up to a stated cap. A “100% up to £100” offer matches the deposit pound for pound to a ceiling of £100. The bonus funds land in a separate balance, with wagering requirements applied before they convert to withdrawable cash. Since 19 December 2025 the wagering multiplier is capped at 10x at UK-licensed sites.
Can a first deposit bonus be funded with cryptocurrency?
Yes, at UK-licensed operators that accept crypto at the cashier. The funding rail does not change the bonus terms. The licence conditions do not soften for crypto: identity verification, GAMSTOP, and the source-of-funds checks all run before any play, regardless of how the money arrives. An anonymous crypto route through a UK-licensed site does not exist.
Does a first deposit bonus require identity verification before it pays out?
Identity verification runs before the first deposit at a UK-licensed site, not before the first withdrawal. The verification — name, address, date of birth, against documents — is a precondition of opening the account, in force since 7 May 2019. A player who has cleared the ID check at the cashier should not see it delay a withdrawal, though the operator’s source-of-funds and financial-vulnerability checks may.
What wagering usually applies to a first deposit bonus in the UK?
Since 19 December 2025, wagering requirements on any bonus at a UK-licensed site are capped at 10x. The cap applies to bonus funds, deposit + bonus combinations, free-spin winnings, and mixed-product offers. The figure is the multiplier ceiling; operators may set lower, and the actual clearing time depends on the spin size and the slot’s RTP. A £100 bonus at 10x requires £1,000 of qualifying wagering.
Is a first deposit bonus separate from a no-deposit bonus?
Yes. A first-deposit bonus is triggered by paying money in — the operator matches a portion of the first deposit up to a cap. A no-deposit bonus is credited on sign-up, without a deposit, and is typically smaller in value and shorter in validity. The wagering cap applies to both. A player who claims a no-deposit bonus and then makes a first deposit may find the two bonuses subject to separate wagering calculations.
How long is a first deposit bonus usually valid for once credited?
Operator-set, not licence-set. Common windows are 7, 14, or 30 days from the moment the bonus funds land in the account. Any un-cleared bonus balance at the end of the window expires, and the wagering contributed to it is forfeit. The window is in the bonus terms, not the offer banner, and is the single most common reason players lose a bonus they thought they were still working on.